Pennsylvania Code & Bulletin

• No statutes or acts will be found at this website.

The Pennsylvania Bulletin website includes the following: Rulemakings by State agencies; Proposed Rulemakings by State agencies; State agency notices; the Governor’s Proclamations and Executive Orders; Actions by the General Assembly; and Statewide and local court rules.

PA Bulletin, Doc. No. 00-884



[49 PA. CODE CH. 37]

Verification/Certification Fees

[30 Pa.B. 2589]

   The State Registration Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors and Geologists (Board) proposes to amend § 37.17 (relating to schedule of fees), pertaining to fees for verification and certification of licensure records to read as set forth in Annex A.

A.  Effective Date

   The amendment will be effective upon publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.

B.  Statutory Authority

   The Board is authorized to set fees by regulation under section 9 of the Engineer, Land Surveyor and Geologist Registration Law (63 P. S. § 156).

C.  Purpose

   The statutory provision requires that the Board increase fees to meet or exceed projected expenditures. Biennial renewal fees support general administrative and enforcement costs. Fees for various services provided directly to applicants or licensees are based upon the actual charge of providing the service requested.

   The fees in this rulemaking represent the cost of providing an official sealed document of Board records. By this amendment, the cost of providing the service will be apportioned to users.

   This rulemaking results from a recent systems audit of the existing fees for services of the State boards within the Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs (Bureau). The audit determined that the current service fees for the State boards were adequate to cover their cost, with the exception of fees charged for verification and certification of license records.

D.  Summary of Comments and Responses to Proposed Rulemaking

   The proposed amendment was published at 29 Pa.B. 1897 (April 10, 1999). No public comments were received. The Board received comments from the House Professional Licensure Committee (HPLC) and the Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC). The following is the Board's response to those comments:

Certification and Verification Fee

   The HPLC questioned under what circumstances the Board ''certifies'' an examination score. The HPLC and IRRC also requested an explanation of the difference between a verification and certification and an explanation of what accounts for the differential in fees.

   The certification of a score is made at the request of a licensee when the licensee is seeking to obtain licensure in another state based upon licensure in this Commonwealth which was issued on the basis of a uniform National or regional examination which was taken in this Commonwealth. Generally the state of original licensure is the only source of the score of the licensee as testing agencies do not maintain this information. The licensure laws of many states include provisions that licensure by reciprocity or endorsement based on licensure in another state will be granted only if the board or agency determines that the qualification are the same or substantially similar. Many state agencies have interpreted this provision to require that licensees have attained a score equal to or exceeding the passing rate in that jurisdiction at the time of original licensure. For this reason, these states require that the State boards of the Commonwealth certify the examination score the applicant achieved on the licensure examination.

   As noted in proposed rulemaking, the difference between the verification and certification fees is the amount of time required to produce the document requested by the licensee. States request different information when making a determination as to whether to grant licensure based on reciprocity or endorsement from another state. The Bureau has been able to create two documents from its records that will meet all of the needs of the requesting state. The licensee, when applying to the other state, receives information as to what documentation and form is acceptable in the requesting state. The Bureau then advises the licensee of the type of document the Bureau can provide and the fee. In the case of a verification, the staff produces the requested documentation by a letter, usually computer generated, which contains the license number, date of original issuance and current expiration date and status of the license. The letters are printed from the Bureau's central computer records and sent to the State boards' staff responsible for handling the licensees application. The letters are sealed, folded and mailed in accordance with the directions of the requestor. The Bureau estimates the average time to prepare this document to be 5 minutes. The Bureau uses the term ''certification fee'' to describe the fee for a request for a document, again generally to support reciprocity or endorsement applications to other states, territories or countries, or for employment of training in another state. A certification document contains information specific to the individual requestor. It may include dates or location where examinations were taken, or scores achieved or hours and location of training. The information is entered onto a document which is usually supplied by the requestor. The average time to prepare a certification is 45 minutes. This is because a number of resources, such as files, microfilm and rosters must be retrieved and consulted to provide the information requested. The State boards' staff then seals and issues this document.

Administrative Overhead

   IRRC requested that the Bureau and the State boards: (1) itemize the overhead cost to be recouped by the fees; and (2) reexamine the method that is used to determine the administrative overhead factor for each fee.

   IRRC commented that although the Bureau's method was reasonable, there was no assurance that the fees would recover the actual overhead cost because the charge was not related to the service, and because the charge was based on the actual rather than the projected expenditures. IRRC also commented that there was no certainty that the projected revenues would meet or exceed projected expenditures, as required under the State boards' enabling statutes.

   In computing overhead charges, the State boards and the Bureau, include expenses resulting from service of support staff operations, equipment, technology initiatives or upgrades, leased office space and other sources not directly attributable to a specific State board. Once determined the Bureau's total administrative charge is apportioned to each State board based upon that board's share of the total active licensee population. In turn, the State boards' administrative charge is divided by the number of active licensees to calculate a per application charge which is added to direct personnel cost to establish the cost of processing. The administrative charge is consistently applied to every application regardless of how much time the staff spends processing the application.

   This method of calculating administrative overhead to be apportioned to fees for services was first included in the biennial reconciliation of fees and expenses conducted in 1988-89. In accordance with the regulatory review, the method was approved by the HPLC, the Senate Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure Committee (SCPPLC) and IRRC as reasonable and consistent with the Legislative intent of statutory provisions which require the State boards to establish fees which meet or exceed expenses.

   IRRC suggested that within each State board, the administrative charge should be determined by the amount of time required to process each application. For example, an application requiring 1/2 hour of processing time would pay one-half as much overhead charge as an application requiring 1 hour of processing time. The Bureau concurs with IRRC that by adopting this methodology, the Bureau and the State boards would more nearly and accurately accomplish their objective of setting fees that cover the cost of the service. Therefore, in accordance with IRRC's suggestions, the Bureau conducted a test to compare the resulting overhead of charge obtained by applying IRRC suggested time factor versus the current method. This review of the State boards' operation showed that approximately 25% of staff time was devoted to providing services described in the regulations. The current method recouped 22% to 28% of the administrative overhead charges versus the 25% recouped using a ratio-based time factor. However, when the time factor is combined with the licensing population for each State board, the resulting fees vary widely even though different licensees may receive the same services. For example, using the time-factor method to issue a verification of licensure would cost $34.58 for a landscape architect as compared with a cost of $10.18 for a cosmetologist. Conversely, under the Bureau method the administrative overhead charge of $9.76 represents the cost of processing a verification application for all licensees in the Bureau. Also, the Bureau found that employing a time factor in the computation of administrative overhead would result in a different amount of overhead charge being made for each fee proposed.

   With regard to IRRC's suggestions concerning projected versus actual expenses, the State boards noted that the computation of projected expenditures based on amounts actually expended has been the basis for biennial reconciliations for the past 10 years. During these five biennial cycles, the experience of both the State boards and the Bureau has been that established and verifiable data which can be substantiated by collective bargaining agreements, pay scales and cost benefit factors. This method has provided a reliable basis for fees. Also, the fees are kept at a minimum for licensees, but appear adequate to sustain the operations of the State boards over an extended period. Similarly accounting, recordkeeping and swift processing of applications, renewals and other fees were the primary basis for rounding up the actual costs to establish a fee. This rounding up process has in effect resulted in the necessary but minimal cushion or surplus to accommodate unexpected needs and expenditures.

   For these reasons, the State boards have not made changes in the method by which it allocates administrative expenditures and the resulting fees will remain as proposed. Additionally, the HPLC requested further information on fees of other states which are comparable in response to Regulatory Analysis Item 25. This has been added to the analysis and is available to the public on request.

   The HPLC also requested with respect to Bureau fees generally that additional information be provided to the Regulatory Analysis Form filed with the HPLC, SCPPLC and IRRC. This information concerned comparable fees of other states (Item 25). Additional information has been provided and a copy of the Regulatory Analysis Form is available to the public upon request.

E.  Regulatory Review

   Under section 5(a) of the Regulatory Review Act (71 P. S. § 745.5(a)), on March 29, 1999, the Board submitted a copy of this proposed rulemaking to the Chairpersons of the HPLC and SCPPLC for review and comment.

   In compliance with section 5(c) of the Regulatory Review Act, the Board also provide additional documentation. In preparing the final-form regulation, the Board considered the comments from the HPLC, SCPPLC and IRRC.

   Under section 5.1(d) of the Regulatory Review Act (71 P. S. § 745.5a(d)), this final-form regulation was deemed approved by the HPLC and SCPPLC on April 11, 2000. Under section 5.1(e) of the Regulatory Review Act, IRRC met on April 27, 2000, and approved the final-form regulation.

F.  Compliance with Executive Order 1996-1

   In accordance with the requirements of Executive Order 1996-1 (February 6, 1996), in drafting and promulgating the regulation, the Board considered the least restrictive alternative to regulate costs for services for certification or verification of licensure.

G.  Fiscal Impact and Paperwork Requirements

   The final-form regulation will have no fiscal impact on the Commonwealth or its political subdivisions. The fees will have a modest fiscal impact on those members of the private sector who request certification or verification services from the Board. The amendment will impose no additional paperwork requirement upon the Commonwealth, political subdivisions or the private sector.

H.  Sunset Date

   The Board continuously monitors the cost effectiveness of its regulations. Therefore, no sunset date has been assigned.

I.  Contact Persons

   The contact person is Shirley Klinger, Administrator, State Registration Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors and Geologists, P. O. Box 2649, Harrisburg, PA 17105-2649.


   The Board finds that:

   (1)  Public notice of proposed rulemaking was given as required by sections 201 and 202 of the act of July 31, 1968 (P. L. 769, No. 240) (45 P. S. §§ 1201 and 1202).

   (2)  A public comment period was provided as required by law.

   (3)  The amendment does not enlarge the scope of proposed rulemaking at 29 Pa.B. 1897.

   (4)  The amendment is necessary and appropriate to administer and enforce the Board's enabling statute.


   The Board, acting under the authority of its enabling statute order that:

   (a)  The regulations of the Board, 49 Pa. Code Chapter 37, are amended by amending § 37.17 to read as set forth in Annex A.

   (b)  The Board shall submit this order and Annex A to the Office of General Counsel and Office of Attorney General as required by law.

   (c)  The Board shall certify this order and Annex A and deposit them with the Legislative Reference Bureau as required by law.

   (d)  This order shall take effect on publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.


   (Editor's Note: For the text of the order of the Independent Regulatory Review Commission relating to this document, see 30 Pa.B. 2430 (May 13, 2000).)

   Fiscal Note: Fiscal Note 16A-477 remains valid for the final adoption of the subject regulation.

Annex A






§ 37.17.  Schedule of fees.

   (a)  Professional engineers and professional land surveyors. The Board will charge the following fees:

   Examination for licensure as a professional engineer$105
   October 1998 examination and thereafter$120
   Professional Engineer Exam Review (Optional)$75
   Examination for licensure as a professional land surveyor$187
   October 1998--April 1999 examination$227
   October 1999 examination and thereafter$252
   Pennsylvania Fundamentals of Land Surveying Portion$42
   N.C.E.E.S. Fundamentals of Land Surveying Portion$40
   October 1998 examination and thereafter$65
   N.C.E.E.S. Principles and Practice of Land Surveying$60
   October 1998-April 1999 examination$75
   October 1999 examination and thereafter$100
   Administration (to be added to total parts taken at one sitting)$45
   Examination for certification as engineer-in-training75
   (b)  Professional geologists. The Board will charge the following fees:
   Application for registration$50
   Biennial renewal fee$25
   Temporary permit fee$25
   Fundamentals of Geology Examination$150
   Principles/Practice of Geology Examination$150
   Examination Access Fee (to be added to each examination taken)$25
   Administration (to be added to total parts taken at one sitting)$45
   (c)  Other fees. The Board will charge the following fees:
   Certification of license, registration, permit or scores$25
   Verification of license, registration or permit$15
[Pa.B. Doc. No. 00-884. Filed for public inspection May 26, 2000, 9:00 a.m.]

No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.

This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.