Pennsylvania Code & Bulletin
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

• No statutes or acts will be found at this website.

The Pennsylvania Bulletin website includes the following: Rulemakings by State agencies; Proposed Rulemakings by State agencies; State agency notices; the Governor’s Proclamations and Executive Orders; Actions by the General Assembly; and Statewide and local court rules.

PA Bulletin, Doc. No. 11-631

NOTICES

Finding

Montgomery County

[41 Pa.B. 1982]
[Saturday, April 9, 2011]

 Under section 2002(b) of The Administrative Code of 1929 (71 P. S. § 512(b)), the Director of Project Delivery, as delegated by the Secretary of Transportation, makes the following written finding:

 The Department of Transportation (Department) is planning a project to rehabilitate the two-span stone arch carrying SR 0152 over Neshaminy Creek. The Section 4(f) resource involved with the project is the bridge to be rehabilitated. The bridge is a narrow two-lane, two-span masonry arch with a length of 42 feet. The bridge was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in June 1988. The proposed project results in a No Adverse Effect finding.

 In accordance with section 2002 of The Administrative Code of 1929 establishing the Department, a Level-1b Categorical Exclusion Evaluation has been developed for the subject project along with a Determination of Section 4(f) De Minimis Use/Section 2002 No Adverse Use document to evaluate the potential environmental impacts caused by the subject project. The document also serves as the Section 2002 Evaluation. The approved documents are available in the CE/EA Expert System.

 Based upon studies, there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the proposed action. Mitigation measures will be taken to minimize harm as stipulated in the Level-1b CE Reevaluation and the Determination of Section 4(f) De Minimis Use/Section 2002 No Adverse Use document.

 The environmental, economic, social and other effects of the proposed project, as enumerated in section 2002 of The Administrative Code of 1929, have been considered. It has been concluded that there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the project as designed, and all reasonable steps have been taken to minimize the effects.

BRIAN G. THOMPSON, P.E., 
Director
Bureau of Project Delivery

[Pa.B. Doc. No. 11-631. Filed for public inspection April 8, 2011, 9:00 a.m.]



No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.

This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.