§ 89.201. Review by Board.
(a) General rule. Upon receipt of a report and recommendation from a hearing committee or special master, the Board shall, except as otherwise provided in this rule, set the dates for submission of briefs and for oral argument before the Board or a panel of at least three of its members designated by the Chair.
(b) Oral argument and briefs. Enforcement Rule 208(d)(1) provides that both parties shall have the right to submit briefs and to present oral argument to a panel of at least three members of the Board, unless such right has been waived in the manner provided by these rules.
(c) Waiver. If neither the respondent-attorney nor the Office of Disciplinary Counsel objects to the findings and recommendations of the hearing committee or special master, oral argument and submission of briefs may be waived by stipulation, subject to approval by the Board. A participant will be conclusively deemed to have waived all objections to the findings and recommendations of the hearing committee or special master and to have stipulated to the waiver of oral argument and submission of briefs unless such participant files exceptions as provided in subsection (d).
(d) Procedure to except to report of hearing committee or special master. Any participant desiring to object to the findings and recommendations of a hearing committee or special master shall, within 20 days after the service of a copy of a report or such other time as may be fixed by the Board Chair, file exceptions to the report or part thereof in a brief (designated ‘‘brief on exceptions’’). ‘‘Briefs opposing exceptions’’ may be filed in response to briefs on exceptions within 20 days after the filing of briefs on exceptions or such other time as may be fixed by the Board Chair. No further response will be entertained unless the Board, with or without motion, so orders.
(e) Oral argument. Unless otherwise ordered by the Board, oral argument shall be deemed waived unless expressly requested in a brief on exception or brief opposing exceptions.
(f) Participation by reviewing members. Enforcement Rule 208(d)(1) provides that members of the Board who have participated on a review panel under § 87.33 (relating to appeal by Office of Disciplinary Counsel for modification of recommendation) or § 87.34 (relating to review of recommendation of private reprimand or public reprimand) shall not participate in further consideration of the same matter or decision thereof on the merits under this section. A Board member who pursuant to § 89.32(b) (relating to withdrawal of petition for discipline) denied an application for leave to withdraw a petition for discipline shall not participate in the consideration of or decision on the merits of that matter.
Source The provisions of this § 89.201 amended March 10, 1989, effective March 11, 1989, 19 Pa.B. 952; amended November 14 and 17, 1989 and December 6 and 20, 1989, effective April 14, 1990, 20 Pa.B. 2009; amended November 2, 2012, effective November 3, 2012, 42 Pa.B. 6864; amended May 3, 2019, effective May 4, 2019, 49 Pa.B. 2217; amended April 18, 2019, effective in 30 days from date of publication, 49 Pa.B. 5552. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (396671) to (396672).
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.
This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.
