§ 16.55. Complaint process.
(a) A person may submit a written complaint to the complaints office alleging a violation of the act or this chapter or Chapter 17 or 18 (relating to State Board of Medicinemedical doctors; and State Board of Medicinepractitioners other than medical doctors), specifying the grounds therefore.
(b) The complaints office will assign a complaint to the prosecution and investigatory staff who, together with medical consultants as may be required, will make a determination that the complaint merits consideration. The Board prosecutor will cause to be conducted reasonable inquiry or investigation that is deemed necessary to determine the truth and validity of the allegations in the complaint. The Board prosecutor will provide reports to the Board at its regular meetings on the number, nature, procedure and handling of the complaints received.
(c) Upon review of the complaint, documentation, records and other materials obtained during the course of an investigation, the Board prosecutor will determine whether to initiate the filing of formal charges. The documents, materials or information obtained during thecourse of an investigation shall be confidential and privileged unless admitted as evidence during the course of a formal disciplinary proceeding. A person who has investigated or has access to or custody of documents, materials or information which are confidential and privileged under this subsection will not be required to testify in any judicial or administrative proceeding without the written consent of the Board.
(d) The Board prosecutor may enter into negotiations at any stage of the complaint, investigation or hearing process to settle the case by consent agreement.
(1) Consent agreements must be approved as to form and legality by the Office of General Counsel and adopted by the Board.
(2) Until the Board approves a consent agreement, the terms of the agreement are confidential.
(3) Admissions made by a respondent during the course of negotiations may not be used against the respondent in any formal disciplinary proceeding if a consent agreement cannot be reached.
(4) Admissions made by a respondent in a consent agreement that is ultimately rejected by the Board may not be used against the respondent in any formal disciplinary proceeding.
(5) This subsection does not preclude the Board prosecutor from offering, at a formal disciplinary hearing, other evidence to prove factual matters disclosed during the negotiation process.
The provisions of this § 16.55 issued under sections 8 and 9 of the Medical Practice Act of 1985 (63 P. S. § § 422.8 and 422.9).
The provisions of this § 16.55 adopted May 20, 2005, effective May 21, 2005, 35 Pa.B. 3019.
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.
This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.